Contributions to Zoology, 70 (4) (2002)Miguel Vences; Frank Glaw; Franco Andreone; Riccardo Jesu; Giovanni Schimmenti: Systematic revision of the enigmatic Malagasy broad-headed frogs (Laurentomantis Dubois, 1980), and their phylogenetic position within the endemic mantellid radiation of Madagascar

To refer to this article use this url:

Phylogenetic analysis

We analysed a total of 54 osteological, morphological, etho-ecological and karyological characters as listed in Appendix 1. Osteological data are based on cleared and stained specimens listed in Table III, and on informations published previously (Glaw et al., 1998; Vences et al., 1998). Non-osteological data were taken from the information summarized in Glaw et al. (1998) and Glaw and Vences (1994). Three species of Heterixalus (family Hyperoliidae) were used as outgroup.

The maximum parsimony analysis (Fig. 6) failed to place Boophis as monophylum: all Boophis species were paraphyletically arranged along the lineage leading to Mantidactylus and Mantella. Mantidactylus and Mantella together formed a monophyletic group, the two Laurentomantis included were sister taxa nested within Mantidactylus. A cluster of three species of the subgenus Gephyromantis were the sister group of Laurentomantis. Mantella was also nested within Mantidactylus, with a species of the subgenus Guibemantis (M. liber) as sister group. Laliostoma and Aglyptodactylus were sister taxa. Bootstrap support for most groupings was low, indicating their relatively low reliability.


Fig. 6. Maximum parsimony cladogram of a phylogenetic analysis of 34 Malagasy anuran species based on the 54 characters listed in Appendix 1. The tree is a strict consensus of 12 equally most parsimonious trees; 324 steps, consistency index 0.364. Species of Heterixalus were used as outgroup. Numbers are bootstrap values in percent (2000 replications; values below 50% not shown).